Hopkins v. Commonwealth
This text of 334 A.2d 856 (Hopkins v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion,
This case is before us in our original jurisdiction. It is a suit against the Commonwealth, in trespass, alleging negligence in failing to properly warn drivers of a dangerous curve and failure to provide an adequate guardrail and shoulder area.
[40]*40The Commonwealth has filed preliminary objections based on sovereign immunity. The preliminary objections must be sustained. See Biello v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, 454 Pa. 179, 301 A.2d 849 (1973) ; Brown v. Commonwealth, 453 Pa. 566, 305 A.2d 868 (1973).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
334 A.2d 856, 18 Pa. Commw. 39, 1975 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 857, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hopkins-v-commonwealth-pacommwct-1975.