Hopkins v. Butte Copper Mining Co.

74 P. 1134, 29 Mont. 396, 1904 Mont. LEXIS 12
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hopkins v. Butte Copper Mining Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 29 Mont. 395
Montana Supreme Court·Decided January 23, 1904·No. No. 1,777·Published

Opinion

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE BRANTLY

delivered the opinion of the court.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of defendant. In this cause there is involved a controversy between the plaintiffs and-the-defendant as to who is entitled to patent, under the laws of [397]*397tlie United States, to a mining claim. Tlie plaintiffs base tbeir claim on the Parasite quartz lode location, and the defendant upon the Blind Treasure quartz lode location.

This case is in all respects similar in its facts to the case of Hopkins et al. v. Butte Copper Co., 29 Mont. 390, 74 Pac. 1081, and the question presented to this court for decision is identical with the question considered and decided therein. For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the judgment of the district court is reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hopkins v. Butte Copper Mining Co., 74 P. 1134, 29 Mont. 396, 1904 Mont. LEXIS 12 (Mo. 1904).

74 P. 1134 (Hopkins v. Butte Copper Mining Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hopkins v. Butte Copper Co.
74 P. 1081 (Montana Supreme Court, 1904)