Hopkins v. Butte Copper Mining Co.

74 P. 1135, 29 Mont. 395, 1904 Mont. LEXIS 13
Montana Supreme Court·Decided January 23, 1904·No. No. 1,776·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE BRANTLY

delivered the opinion of the court.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of defendant. In this cause there is involved a controversy between the plaintiff and the defendant as to who is entitled to patent, under the laws of the [396]*396United States, to a mining claim. The -plaintiff bases his claim on the Brookside quartz, lode mining location, and the defendant upon the Blind Treasure quartz lode location.

This case is in all respects similar in its facts to the case of Hopkins et al. v. Butte Copper Co., 29 Mont. 390, 74 Pac. 1081, and the question presented to this court for decision is identical with the question considered and decided therein. Por the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the judgment of the district court is reversed, and the .cause remanded for further proceedings. ... ,.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hopkins v. Butte Copper Mining Co., 74 P. 1135, 29 Mont. 395, 1904 Mont. LEXIS 13 (Mo. 1904).

74 P. 1135 (Hopkins v. Butte Copper Mining Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Woody v. Hinds
76 P. 1 (Montana Supreme Court, 1904)