Hope v. . Peterson
90 S.E. 257, 172 N.C. 869, 1916 N.C. LEXIS 434
This text of 90 S.E. 257 (Hope v. . Peterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hope v. . Peterson, 90 S.E. 257, 172 N.C. 869, 1916 N.C. LEXIS 434 (N.C. 1916).
Opinion
The defendant moves in this Court to dismiss the action because it is brought in the name of the father and not by the executor or administrator of the son, and the motion must be sustained.
The case of Killian v. R. R., 128 N. C., 261, decides the exact question in favor of the defendant.
Action dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Gibson v. Campbell
222 S.E.2d 449 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1976)
White v. . Comrs. of Johnston
7 S.E.2d 825 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1940)
Brown v. Southern Railway Co.
162 S.E. 613 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1932)
Hinnant v. Tidewater Power Co.
126 S.E. 307 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1925)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
90 S.E. 257, 172 N.C. 869, 1916 N.C. LEXIS 434, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hope-v-peterson-nc-1916.