Hope v. Perales

619 N.E.2d 647, 82 N.Y.2d 681, 601 N.Y.S.2d 569, 1993 N.Y. LEXIS 2241
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hope v. Perales. Read the opinion of the Court — 83 N.Y.2d 563
New York Court of Appeals·Decided July 6, 1993·Published

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that part of the Appellate Division order that affirmed Supreme Court’s denial of the motions to intervene, dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution and, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the remainder of the Appellate Division order, dismissed upon the ground that, absent an order of intervention, Alma Poindexter, St. Vincent’s Hospital and Medical Center of New York, Our Lady of Mercy Medical Center, and St. Mary’s Hospital of Brooklyn are not parties to the action and thus lack capacity to challenge that part of the order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hope v. Perales, 619 N.E.2d 647, 82 N.Y.2d 681, 601 N.Y.S.2d 569, 1993 N.Y. LEXIS 2241 (N.Y. 1993).

619 N.E.2d 647 (Hope v. Perales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.