Hope v. Perales

New York Court of Appeals

Hope v. Perales

619 N.E.2d 646, 82 N.Y.2d 680, 601 N.Y.S.2d 568, 1993 N.Y. LEXIS 2240

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 6, 1993

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 619 N.E.2d 646 (Hope v. Perales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hope v. Perales, 619 N.E.2d 646, 82 N.Y.2d 680, 601 N.Y.S.2d 568, 1993 N.Y. LEXIS 2240 (N.Y. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion to dismiss the appeals taken by Alma Poindexter, [681]*681St. Vincent’s Hospital and Medical Center of New York, Our Lady of Mercy Medical Center, and St. Mary’s Hospital of Brooklyn granted and the appeals, insofar as taken from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed the order of Supreme Court denying the motions to intervene, dismissed upon the ground that that part of the Appellate Division order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution and, insofar as taken from the remainder of the Appellate Division order, dismissed, with $400 costs and $100 costs of motion, upon the ground that, absent an order of intervention, the proposed intervenors-appellants are not parties to the action and thus lack capacity to challenge that part of the order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to dismiss the appeals taken by Alma Poindexter, [681]*681St. Vincent’s Hospital and Medical Center of New York, Our Lady of Mercy Medical Center, and St. Mary’s Hospital of Brooklyn granted and the appeals, insofar as taken from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed the order of Supreme Court denying the motions to intervene, dismissed upon the ground that that part of the Appellate Division order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution and, insofar as taken from the remainder of the Appellate Division order, dismissed, with $400 costs and $100 costs of motion, upon the ground that, absent an order of intervention, the proposed intervenors-appellants are not parties to the action and thus lack capacity to challenge that part of the order.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

619 N.E.2d 646, 82 N.Y.2d 680, 601 N.Y.S.2d 568, 1993 N.Y. LEXIS 2240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hope-v-perales-ny-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack