Hoover v. Tex. & P. R'y Co.

61 Tex. 503, 1884 Tex. LEXIS 133
Texas Supreme Court·Decided May 6, 1884·No. Case No. 4990·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

West, Associate Justice.—

We have examined very closely into the facts of this case, and after some hesitation have reached the conclusion that the judgment of the district court is sustained by the law and the evidence.

The court found, and the evidence justified the court in so finding, that the deceased was guilty of contributory negligence.

The general rule is, that a person (or his heirs in case of his death) cannot recover for an injury to which he contributed by his own want of ordinary care. Pierce on Railroads, p. 323.

The record shows that at the period when the deceased entered upon the appellee’s track, the danger from the engine and tender was imminent, and that in so doing he was unquestionably guilty of negligence that was the proximate cause of the injuries received by [506]*506him. We have examined the authorities relied upon by appellants, and have reached the conclusion that there was no error in the judgment of the court below, and it is accordingly affirmed.

Affirmed.

[Opinion delivered May 6, 1884.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hoover v. Tex. & P. R'y Co., 61 Tex. 503, 1884 Tex. LEXIS 133 (Tex. 1884).

61 Tex. 503 (Hoover v. Tex. & P. R'y Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Taylor v. Haynes
19 S.W.2d 850 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1929)
Murphy v. Wabash Railroad
128 S.W. 481 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1910)
Cowles v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.
96 Tex. 24 (Texas Supreme Court, 1902)
Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Cowles
67 S.W. 1078 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1902)
G., C. & S. F. R'y Co. v. Dodson
3 Willson 466 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1888)
Mo. Pac. R'y Co. v. Burnett
3 Willson 287 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1887)