Hoover v. Hoover
131 P.2d 917, 156 Kan. 31, 1942 Kan. LEXIS 8
Opinions
(dissenting): After the original opinion in this case was handed down, the case of Yeager v. Yeager, 155 Kan. 734, 129 P. 2d 249, was decided. For the reasons set forth in my dissenting opinion in the Yeager case I am unable to concur with the majority opinion in this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hoover v. Hoover, 131 P.2d 917, 156 Kan. 31, 1942 Kan. LEXIS 8 (kan 1942).
131 P.2d 917 (Hoover v. Hoover) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Schmidt v. United States
279 F. Supp. 811 (D. Kansas, 1968)
Community of Woodston v. State Corporation Comm.
353 P.2d 206 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1960)
Patmore v. MacKecknie
296 P.2d 863 (California Court of Appeal, 1956)
Osborn v. Cassity
208 P.2d 257 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1949)
Magaw v. Emick
207 P.2d 488 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1949)
Babb v. Stewart
190 P.2d 872 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1948)
Estate of Schroeder v. Schroeder
150 P.2d 173 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1944)
Grove v. Grove
148 P.2d 497 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1944)
Garden v. Haines
148 P.2d 745 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1944)