Hooper Webb v. Blount Memorial Hospital

303 F.2d 437, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 5169
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedMay 9, 1962
Docket14713_1
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 303 F.2d 437 (Hooper Webb v. Blount Memorial Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hooper Webb v. Blount Memorial Hospital, 303 F.2d 437, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 5169 (6th Cir. 1962).

Opinion

ORDER.

This action by plaintiff-appellant was brought in the District Court because of personal injuries resulting from alleged negligence of the defendant-appellee. Following a jury verdict for the plaintiff the trial court sustained defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict on the ground that the operation of the defendant hospital is a governmental function of Blount County, a political subdivision of the State of Tennessee, and is, therefore, immune from liability for tort. Plaintiff is here on appeal from this ruling.

Defendant is a non-profit public welfare corporation organized under the laws of the State of Tennessee and owned by Blount County, Tennessee.

The question here is whether a corporation such as the defendant can be held liable in tort.

IT APPEARING that the district judge in his opinion (196 F.Supp. 114, D.C.Tenn., 1961) reviewed the law of Tennessee relative to the facts herein and concluded on the basis of McMahon v. Baroness Erlanger Hospital, 43 Tenn.App. 128, 306 S.W.2d 41, 1957, and the cases cited therein, that a non-profit public welfare hospital corporation owned by a political subdivision of the State of Tennessee and operated as a governmental function of such subdivision was not liable for the torts of its agents, servants and employees; and

IT FURTHER APPEARING after consideration of the record, arguments *438 and briefs of counsel that there is no reversible error in the action of the trial judge;

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the judgment of the District Court be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wanda Cruise v. City of Columbia - Concurring
922 S.W.2d 492 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1996)
Lois Sawyer and David Sawyer v. Methodist Hospital
522 F.2d 1102 (Sixth Circuit, 1975)
Sawyer v. Methodist Hospital of Memphis
383 F. Supp. 563 (W.D. Tennessee, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
303 F.2d 437, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 5169, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hooper-webb-v-blount-memorial-hospital-ca6-1962.