Hooper v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Hooper v. State

156 S.W. 221

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hooper v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 138 S.W. 396 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided April 23, 1913·Published

Opinion

PRENDERGAST, J..

Appellant was convicted for unlawfully selling intoxicating liquors in Angelina county after prohibition had been put in effect in said county, since the enactment making such sale a felony, and his punishment fixed at three years in the penitentiary.

There is neither a bill of exception nor a statement of facts in this case. No question is raised which we can consider without a statement of facts. The indictment, charge, judgment of conviction, and sentence are in proper form.

The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PRENDERGAST, J..

Appellant was convicted for unlawfully selling intoxicating liquors in Angelina county after prohibition had been put in effect in said county, since the enactment making such sale a felony, and his punishment fixed at three years in the penitentiary.

There is neither a bill of exception nor a statement of facts in this case. No question is raised which we can consider without a statement of facts. The indictment, charge, judgment of conviction, and sentence are in proper form.

The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Hooper v. State, 156 S.W. 221 (Tex. 1913).

Pincite

156 S.W. 221 (Hooper v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.