Hooper v. State

138 S.W. 396
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 7, 1911·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PRENDERGAST, J.

The appellant was charged with unlawfully carrying a pistol, tried and convicted, and his penalty fixed at a fine of $100 and 60 days’ imprisonment in the county jail.

The Assistant Attorney General has made a motion to strike out the statement of facts and bills of exception and not consider them, because they were filed more than 20 days after the adjournment of the court. Court adjourned on February 4, 1911. The bills of exception and statement of facts were not filed until March 4, 1911. The court granted a 30-day order after adjournment of court for filing bills of exception and statement of facts. It had no power or authority to do this. Twenty days was the full time. See Davis v. State, supra, this day decided, and authorities there cited. The motion of the Assistant Attorney General is therefore sustained, and said statement of facts and bills of exception are struck out and not considered.

There is no other question raised in the record that can be considered without a statement of facts and bills of exception. The complaint and information, and proceedings under which appellant was convicted, are regular.

The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hooper v. State, 138 S.W. 396 (Tex. 1911).

138 S.W. 396 (Hooper v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

De Friend v. State
153 S.W. 881 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1913)
Focke v. State
144 S.W. 267 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1912)
Thompson v. State
142 S.W. 908 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1912)
Sheppard's Home v. Wood
140 S.W. 394 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1911)