Hooks v. Hopper
This text of 205 S.E.2d 301 (Hooks v. Hopper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
This habeas corpus attacks petitioner’s conviction of murder and a life sentence on the following grounds: (1) denial of bail bond because of race, (2) improper admission of evidence, (3) ineffective assistance of counsel, (4) denial of appeal and denial of effective assistance of counsel on appeal, (5) Miranda violations, (6) lack of a preliminary hearing, (7) the state’s use of perjured testimony, (8) insufficiency of evidence, (9) failure to discover a weapon allegedly used by the victim to threaten petitioner, and (10) unlawful modification of his sentence from seven years to life. Held:
Petitioner was represented by employed counsel who is an experienced attorney with a substantial background in the trial of criminal cases. He has tried more than twenty murder cases. He testified that he met privately with petitioner and petitioner’s mother in an extended conversation after petitioner’s conviction and sentence. He stated petitioner understood fully his right to appeal and failed to instruct him to take such action. [74]*74He further stated the evidence against petitioner was overwhelming and that an appeal would have been "utterly frivolous.” We find no error. Davis v. Ault, 231 Ga. 406 (202 SE2d 53). See Gregory v. United States, 446 F2d 498 (1).
We have reviewed petitioner’s other complaints and read the transcript of the habeas corpus hearing. We have concluded his contentions are without merit.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
205 S.E.2d 301, 232 Ga. 73, 1974 Ga. LEXIS 867, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hooks-v-hopper-ga-1974.