Davis v. Ault
This text of 202 S.E.2d 53 (Davis v. Ault) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal is from the denial of a motion [407]*407for a new trial in a habeas corpus proceeding based upon newly discovered evidence. It is contended that such evidence shows the appellant was not advised of his right to appeal his conviction. We do not agree. In our opinion the evidence is sufficient to show that appellant was made cognizant of his right of appeal. His underlying complaint is and was that his sentence of 10 years for aggravated assault was too harsh. His attorney properly advised him the sentence was legal and an attempt to obtain a new trial would be unavailing. Appellant’s dissatisfaction with his sentence arose when he refused a "plea bargained” sentence of not more than five years and elected to go to trial at which the jury imposed a ten-year sentence.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
202 S.E.2d 53, 231 Ga. 406, 1973 Ga. LEXIS 721, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-ault-ga-1973.