Hooker v. Thompson
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE FILED March 20, 1998 JOHN JAY HOOKER, ) ) Cecil W. Crowson Plaintiff/Appellant, ) Appellate Court Clerk )
VS. ) Davidson Chancery ) No. 96-3601-II SEN. FRED D. THOMPSON, ) )
Defendant/Appellee, ) ) Consolidated and ) Appeal No. ) 01-A-01-9709-CH-00533 JOHN JAY HOOKER, ) )
Plaintiff/Appellant, ) ) Davidson Chancery VS. ) No. 96-2847-III )
DON SUNDQUIST, ET AL., ) )
Defendants/Appellees. )
ORD ER O N PE TITION TO REHE AR
The appellant has filed a respectful petition to rehear, which we have
considered and found to be without merit.
It is, therefore, ordered that the petition be and hereby is overruled.
HENRY F. TODD, PRESIDING JUDGE MIDDLE SECTION
BEN H. CANTRELL, JUDGE
WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hooker v. Thompson (Hooker v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.