Hooker v. Thompson

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hooker v. Thompson. Read the opinion of the Court — 1998 Tenn. App. LEXIS 147
Court of Appeals of Tennessee·Decided March 20, 1998·No. 01A01-9709-CH-00533·Published

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE FILED March 20, 1998 JOHN JAY HOOKER, ) ) Cecil W. Crowson Plaintiff/Appellant, ) Appellate Court Clerk )

VS. ) Davidson Chancery ) No. 96-3601-II SEN. FRED D. THOMPSON, ) )

Defendant/Appellee, ) ) Consolidated and ) Appeal No. ) 01-A-01-9709-CH-00533 JOHN JAY HOOKER, ) )

Plaintiff/Appellant, ) ) Davidson Chancery VS. ) No. 96-2847-III )

DON SUNDQUIST, ET AL., ) )

Defendants/Appellees. )

ORD ER O N PE TITION TO REHE AR

The appellant has filed a respectful petition to rehear, which we have

considered and found to be without merit.

It is, therefore, ordered that the petition be and hereby is overruled.

HENRY F. TODD, PRESIDING JUDGE MIDDLE SECTION

BEN H. CANTRELL, JUDGE

WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hooker v. Thompson, (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998).

Hooker v. Thompson (Hooker v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.