Hooker v. State
This text of 621 S.W.2d 597 (Hooker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
OPINION
This is an appeal from a conviction for injury to a child. The jury assessed punishment at twelve years and a $6,000.00 fine.
In his first ground of error, Hooker contends that the trial court erred in overruling his motion for a change of venue. The motion was properly supported by an affidavit signed by two persons and was denied without an evidentiary hearing. No controverting affidavits had been filed by the State.
This is the identical issue posed in Hussey v. State, 590 S.W.2d 505 (Tex.Cr.App.1979), where we held that it had been long established that a defendant was entitled to a change of venue as a matter of law when the State fails to challenge the motion either by controverting affidavits or by evidence presented at the hearing on the motion. The failure to grant the change of venue is reversible error. See also Durrough v. State, 562 S.W.2d 488 (Tex.Cr.App.1978).
The judgment is reversed and remanded.
PHILLIPS, J., not participating.
Before the court en banc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
621 S.W.2d 597, 1980 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hooker-v-state-texcrimapp-1980.