Hoofe v. KEENE CORPORATION

276 A.2d 269, 1971 Del. LEXIS 297
Supreme Court of Delaware·Decided March 25, 1971·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from the grant by the Vice Chancellor of the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment for the recovery of certain shares of its stock issued to the plaintiff pursuant to the defendant’s Stock Option Plan. The defendant also appeals from the denial of his cross-motion for summary judgment on his counterclaim. The plaintiff has moved to dismiss the defendant’s appeal.

The relevant facts are set out carefully and at length in the opinion of the Vice Chancellor reported at 267 A.2d 618. We affirm the decision of the Vice Chancellor for the reasons set forth in his opinion. We further hold that the order denying the cross-motions for summary judgment on the defendant’s counterclaim involved neither an adjudication of legal right nor substantial issue, and is therefore an unappealable interlocutory order. Cross v. Hair, Del.Supr., 258 A.2d 277 (1969).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hoofe v. KEENE CORPORATION, 276 A.2d 269, 1971 Del. LEXIS 297 (Del. 1971).

276 A.2d 269 (Hoofe v. KEENE CORPORATION) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kent v. Avco Corp.
849 F. Supp. 833 (D. Connecticut, 1994)
Irwin & Leighton, Inc. v. W.M. Anderson Co.
532 A.2d 983 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1987)
Baylis v. Wilmington Medical Center, Inc.
477 A.2d 1051 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1984)
Western Air Lines, Inc. v. Allegheny Airlines, Inc.
313 A.2d 145 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1973)