Hood v. United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina

530 U.S. 1289, 147 L. Ed. 2d 1027, 121 S. Ct. 3, 69 U.S.L.W. 3110, 2000 U.S. LEXIS 4712
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided August 7, 2000·No. No. 98-9849; No. 99-1555; No. 99-1560; No. 99-1561; No. 99-1568; No. 99-1616; No. 99-1678; No. 99-1699; No. 99-1776; No. 99-6779; No. 99-7000; No. 99-7649; No. 99-7663; No. 99-7866; No. 99-8128; No. 99-8156; No. 99-8157; No. 99-8206; No. 99-8303; No. 99-8317; No. 99-8438; No. 99-8466; No. 99-8481; No. 99-8544; No. 99-8577; No. 99-8669; No. 99-8679; No. 99-8694; No. 99-8733; No. 99-8772; No. 99-8844; No. 99-8854; No. 99-8871; No. 99-8897; No. 99-8906; No. 99-8925; No. 99-8948; No. 99-8964; No. 99-9002; No. 99-9007; No. 99-9017; No. 99-9022; No. 99-9095; No. 99-9134; No. 99-9171; No. 99-9196; No. 99-9248; No. 99-9277; No. 99-9376; No. 99-9563; No. 99-5252·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

[1289]*1289528 U. S. 856;

ante, p. 1242;

ante, p. 1223;

529 U. S. 1130;

ante, p. 1204;

ante, p. 1205;

ante, p. 1215;

ante, p. 1231;

528 U. S. 1087;

ante, p. 156;

528 U. S. 1152;

529 U. S. 1007;

529 U. S. 1039;

529 U. S. 1071;

529 U. S. 1072;

529 U. S. 1097;

[1290]*1290No. 99-8303. No. 99-8317. No. 99-8438. No. 99-8466. No. 99-8481. No. 99-8544. No. 99-8577. No. 99-8669. No. 99-8679. No. 99-8694. No. 99-8733. No. 99-8772. No. 99-8844. No. 99-8854. No. 99-8871. No. 99-8897. No. 99-8906. No. 99-8925. No. 99-8948. No. 99-8964. No. 99-9002. No. 99-9007. No. 99-9017. No. 99-9022. No. 99-9095. No. 99-9134.

529 U. S. 1075;

529 U. S. 1089;

529 U. S. 1101;

529 U. S. 1112;

529 U. S. 1077;

529 U. S. 1115;

529 U. S. 1132;

529 U. S. 1093;

ante, p. 1228;

ante, p. 1207;

529 U. S. 1118;

ante, p. 1216;

529 U. S. 1119;

ante, p. 1217;

ante, p. 1218;

529 U. S. 1120;

ante, p. 1208;

ante, p. 1233;

ante, p. 1219;

ante, p. 1247;

[1291]*1291No. 99-9171. No. 99-9196. No. 99-9248. No. 99-9277. No. 99-9376. No. 99-9563. No. 99-5252.

ante, p. 1265;

ante, p. 1248;

ante, p. 1220;

ante, p. 1222; and

ante, p. 1260. Petitions for rehearing denied.

528 U. S. 894. Motion for leave to file petition for rehearing denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hood v. United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, 530 U.S. 1289, 147 L. Ed. 2d 1027, 121 S. Ct. 3, 69 U.S.L.W. 3110, 2000 U.S. LEXIS 4712 (2000).

530 U.S. 1289 (Hood v. United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Terry Ezell v. United States
Ninth Circuit, 2015
Costello v. St. Francis Hospital
258 F. Supp. 2d 144 (E.D. New York, 2003)
United States v. Concha
233 F.3d 1249 (Tenth Circuit, 2000)
Richard Dale Talbott, Applicant v. State of Indiana
226 F.3d 866 (Seventh Circuit, 2000)