Hood v. United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina

530 U.S. 1289
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedAugust 7, 2000
DocketNo. 98-9849; No. 99-1555; No. 99-1560; No. 99-1561; No. 99-1568; No. 99-1616; No. 99-1678; No. 99-1699; No. 99-1776; No. 99-6779; No. 99-7000; No. 99-7649; No. 99-7663; No. 99-7866; No. 99-8128; No. 99-8156; No. 99-8157; No. 99-8206; No. 99-8303; No. 99-8317; No. 99-8438; No. 99-8466; No. 99-8481; No. 99-8544; No. 99-8577; No. 99-8669; No. 99-8679; No. 99-8694; No. 99-8733; No. 99-8772; No. 99-8844; No. 99-8854; No. 99-8871; No. 99-8897; No. 99-8906; No. 99-8925; No. 99-8948; No. 99-8964; No. 99-9002; No. 99-9007; No. 99-9017; No. 99-9022; No. 99-9095; No. 99-9134; No. 99-9171; No. 99-9196; No. 99-9248; No. 99-9277; No. 99-9376; No. 99-9563; No. 99-5252
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 530 U.S. 1289 (Hood v. United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hood v. United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, 530 U.S. 1289 (2000).

Opinion

[1289]*1289528 U. S. 856;

ante, p. 1242;

ante, p. 1223;

529 U. S. 1130;

ante, p. 1204;

ante, p. 1205;

ante, p. 1215;

ante, p. 1231;

528 U. S. 1087;

ante, p. 156;

528 U. S. 1152;

529 U. S. 1007;

529 U. S. 1039;

529 U. S. 1071;

529 U. S. 1072;

529 U. S. 1097;

[1290]*1290No. 99-8303. No. 99-8317. No. 99-8438. No. 99-8466. No. 99-8481. No. 99-8544. No. 99-8577. No. 99-8669. No. 99-8679. No. 99-8694. No. 99-8733. No. 99-8772. No. 99-8844. No. 99-8854. No. 99-8871. No. 99-8897. No. 99-8906. No. 99-8925. No. 99-8948. No. 99-8964. No. 99-9002. No. 99-9007. No. 99-9017. No. 99-9022. No. 99-9095. No. 99-9134.

529 U. S. 1075;

529 U. S. 1089;

529 U. S. 1101;

529 U. S. 1112;

529 U. S. 1077;

529 U. S. 1115;

529 U. S. 1132;

529 U. S. 1093;

ante, p. 1228;

ante, p. 1207;

529 U. S. 1118;

ante, p. 1216;

529 U. S. 1119;

ante, p. 1217;

ante, p. 1218;

529 U. S. 1120;

ante, p. 1208;

ante, p. 1233;

ante, p. 1219;

ante, p. 1247;

[1291]*1291No. 99-9171. No. 99-9196. No. 99-9248. No. 99-9277. No. 99-9376. No. 99-9563. No. 99-5252.

ante, p. 1265;

ante, p. 1248;

ante, p. 1220;

ante, p. 1222; and

ante, p. 1260. Petitions for rehearing denied.

528 U. S. 894. Motion for leave to file petition for rehearing denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

BURDINE, ROMMEL, PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017
People v. Burdine
147 A.D.3d 1471 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
530 U.S. 1289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hood-v-united-states-district-court-for-the-western-district-of-north-scotus-2000.