Hoobler v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Hoobler v. State

118 So. 234, 22 Ala. App. 599

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 8, 1928

Docket6 Div. 335.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 118 So. 234 (Hoobler v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hoobler v. State, 118 So. 234, 22 Ala. App. 599 (Ala. Ct. App. 1928).

Pincite

Opinions

Under the evidence in this case it was a question of fact, to be decided by the judge sitting without a jury, whether the defendant was a prostitute or the keeper of a house of prostitution. On this question the evidence was in conflict. The court adjudged the defendant guilty, and we see no legal reason to disturb his finding. *Page 600

There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Under the evidence in this case it was a question of fact, to be decided by the judge sitting without a jury, whether the defendant was a prostitute or the keeper of a house of prostitution. On this question the evidence was in conflict. The court adjudged the defendant guilty, and we see no legal reason to disturb his finding. *Page 600

There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

118 So. 234, 22 Ala. App. 599, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoobler-v-state-alactapp-1928.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack