Hoobler v. State

118 So. 234, 22 Ala. App. 599
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided May 8, 1928·No. 6 Div. 335.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

Under the evidence in this case it was a question of fact, to be decided by the judge sitting without a jury, whether the defendant was a prostitute or the keeper of a house of prostitution. On this question the evidence was in conflict. The court adjudged the defendant guilty, and we see no legal reason to disturb his finding. *Page 600

There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hoobler v. State, 118 So. 234, 22 Ala. App. 599 (Ala. Ct. App. 1928).

118 So. 234 (Hoobler v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hoobler v. State
118 So. 234 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1928)