Hoober v. SAIF
This text of 340 Or. App. 148 (Hoober v. SAIF) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
148 April 23, 2025 No. 372
This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON
In the Matter of the Compensation of Gregory W. Hoober, Claimant. Gregory W. HOOBER, Petitioner, v. SAIF CORPORATION and MAINSHEET INC., Respondents. Workers’ Compensation Board 2203462; A182100
Argued and submitted March 20, 2025. Jodie Anne Phillips Polich argued the cause for peti- tioner. Also on the briefs was Law Offices of Jodie Anne Phillips Polich, P.C. Daniel Walker argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents. Before Shorr, Presiding Judge, Pagán, Judge, and Walters, Senior Judge. PER CURIAM Affirmed. Robinette v. SAIF, 369 Or 767, 511 P3d 1074 (2022); Gramada v. SAIF, 326 Or App 276, 532 P3d 539, rev den, 371 Or 511 (2023); Netherton v. Aerotek Inc., 292 Or App 550, 424 P3d 764 (2018).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
340 Or. App. 148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoober-v-saif-orctapp-2025.