Home Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Hulsey

121 S.E.2d 311, 104 Ga. App. 123, 1961 Ga. App. LEXIS 620
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 29, 1961
Docket38943
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 121 S.E.2d 311 (Home Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Hulsey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Home Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Hulsey, 121 S.E.2d 311, 104 Ga. App. 123, 1961 Ga. App. LEXIS 620 (Ga. Ct. App. 1961).

Opinions

Nichols, Judge.

In view of the quoted allegations which when construed against the pleader, as they must be construed on general demurrer, allege no more than constructive knowledge, or that the defendant should have known of the alleged slick and dangerous condition, and in order to set forth a cause of action the petition must allege facts or circumstances sufficient to make it a question of fact as to whether the alleged dangerous condition had existed for a sufficient length of time so that knowledge would be imputed to the defendant. See Setzers Super Stores of Ga. v. Higgins, ante; Cook v. Kroger Baking &c. Co., 65 Ga. App. 141 (15 SE2d 531); Jones v. West End Theatre Co., 94 Ga. App. 299 (94 SE2d 135).

The petition alleged that on August 15, 1958, the defendant occupied the building and carried on its business there, and on such date maintained the air conditioner, and operated the same on such date, that it knew that pedestrians used the alley during each day of August 1958, and that it should have known of the dangerous condition existing on August 15, 1958. The petition is barren of any allegation that the defendant occupied the building prior to August 15, 1958, or that the air conditioner was in operation prior to August 15, 1958 (the date on which the plaintiff was allegedly injured), and under the above cited cases the judgment overruling the defendant’s general demurrer must be reversed because no facts or other circumstances appear that would authorize a finding that the defendant had sufficient notice of the facts to impute knowledge of the alleged condition to it so that such condition should have been corrected.

Judgment reversed.

Carlisle, P. J., concurs. Eberhardt, J., concurs specially.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mitchell v. Food Giant, Inc.
337 S.E.2d 353 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1985)
Piggly-Wiggly Southern, Inc. v. Tucker
229 S.E.2d 804 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1976)
Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Hardy
226 S.E.2d 142 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1976)
Professional Building, Inc. v. Reagen
199 S.E.2d 266 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1973)
Elebash v. Whitley
151 S.E.2d 196 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1966)
Sharpton v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
145 S.E.2d 101 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1965)
Gibson v. Consolidated Credit Corp.
138 S.E.2d 77 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1964)
BELK-GALLANT COMPANY v. Cordell
131 S.E.2d 575 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1963)
Miller v. Farmers & Merchants Bank
131 S.E.2d 211 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1963)
Home Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Hulsey
121 S.E.2d 311 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1961)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
121 S.E.2d 311, 104 Ga. App. 123, 1961 Ga. App. LEXIS 620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/home-federal-savings-loan-assn-v-hulsey-gactapp-1961.