Homburger v. Levitin
This text of 127 A.D.2d 565 (Homburger v. Levitin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In actions, inter alia, for the dissolution of a partnership, the defendants Lazar Levitin and Ocean Parkway Medical Building, a limited partnership, appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Held, J.), dated February 24, 1986, which denied their cross motion for a protective order.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs to the respondent Pomirchy, payable by the appellants.
Under the circumstances of this case, Special Term did not abuse its discretion in directing discovery and inspection of the items in question (see, Homburger v Levitin, 114 AD2d 885). Mangano, J. P., Brown, Rubin and Fiber, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
127 A.D.2d 565, 511 N.Y.S.2d 546, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 53402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/homburger-v-levitin-nyappdiv-1987.