Homburger v. Levitin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Homburger v. Levitin

114 A.D.2d 885, 495 N.Y.S.2d 652, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 53913

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 12, 1985·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—In an action for an accounting, appointment of a receiver and a permanent injunction, defendants Lazar Levitin and Ocean Parkway Medical Building, a limited partnership, appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Scholnick, J.), dated October 4, 1984, which compelled them to produce for discovery and inspection, at the taking of their deposition, various documents referred to in plaintiff’s notice of discovery and inspection.

Order affirmed, with costs.

[886] Under the circumstances of this case discovery and inspection of the items in question is proper. Lazer, J. P., Thompson, O’Connor, Rubin and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action for an accounting, appointment of a receiver and a permanent injunction, defendants Lazar Levitin and Ocean Parkway Medical Building, a limited partnership, appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Scholnick, J.), dated October 4, 1984, which compelled them to produce for discovery and inspection, at the taking of their deposition, various documents referred to in plaintiff’s notice of discovery and inspection.

Order affirmed, with costs.

[886] Under the circumstances of this case discovery and inspection of the items in question is proper. Lazer, J. P., Thompson, O’Connor, Rubin and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.

Homburger v. Levitin, 114 A.D.2d 885, 495 N.Y.S.2d 652, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 53913 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

114 A.D.2d 885 (Homburger v. Levitin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related