Hom v. Zullo

7 A.D.3d 624, 775 N.Y.S.2d 886
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 10, 2004·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Lawrence, J.), dated May 20, 2003, which denied his petition, inter alia, for a change of custody of the parties’ daughter.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Family Court properly denied the father’s petition for a change of custody since he did not make an evidentiary showing which would warrant a change of custody (see generally Matter of Coutsoukis v Samora, 265 AD2d 482 [1999]).

The father’s remaining contentions are without merit. Florio, J.P., Townes, Cozier and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hom v. Zullo, 7 A.D.3d 624, 775 N.Y.S.2d 886 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

7 A.D.3d 624 (Hom v. Zullo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bryant M. v. Kelly O.
44 A.D.3d 951 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)