Coutsoukis v. Samora

265 A.D.2d 482, 697 N.Y.S.2d 118
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 18, 1999
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 265 A.D.2d 482 (Coutsoukis v. Samora) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Coutsoukis v. Samora, 265 A.D.2d 482, 697 N.Y.S.2d 118 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

—In related child custody proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals from (1) an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Braslow, J.), [483]*483dated March 16, 1998, which dismissed, without a hearing, his petition alleging violation of an out-of-State temporary custody order, (2) an order of the same court dated April 28, 1998, which dismissed, without a hearing, his petition seeking modification of an out-of-State custody order, and (3) an order of the same court dated May 29, 1998, which dismissed, without a hearing, his second petition seeking modification of the same out-of-State custody order.

Ordered that the orders are affirmed, with one bill of costs.

Contrary to the father’s contention, the Family Court did not err in dismissing his petition for a change of custody without first conducting a hearing (see, Matter of Ann C. v Debra S., 221 AD2d 338; Matter of Wolfer v Dame, 207 AD2d 898, 899). A parent who seeks a change of custody is not automatically entitled to a hearing but must make some evidentiary showing sufficient to warrant a hearing (see, David W. v Julia W., 158 AD2d 1). Here, the Family Court, which had a familiarity with the history of the case, properly determined that the father failed to make a showing sufficient to warrant a hearing (see, Teuschler v Teuschler, 242 AD2d 289, 290; Matter of Miller v Lee, 225 AD2d 778, 779).

The father’s remaining contentions are without merit. S. Miller, J. P., Sullivan, Altman and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Salick v. Salick
66 A.D.3d 757 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Bryant M. v. Kelly O.
44 A.D.3d 951 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
In re Sergei P. v. Sofia M.
44 A.D.3d 490 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
McNally v. McNally
28 A.D.3d 526 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Bruno v. Kerr
14 A.D.3d 611 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Hom v. Zullo
7 A.D.3d 624 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Simmons v. Budney
5 A.D.3d 389 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Goldberg v. Goldberg
300 A.D.2d 585 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Corigliano v. Corigliano
297 A.D.2d 328 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Phelps v. La Point
284 A.D.2d 605 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
DiVittorio v. DiVittorio
283 A.D.2d 390 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Reese v. Jones
279 A.D.2d 939 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Milhollen v. Voelpel
270 A.D.2d 422 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
265 A.D.2d 482, 697 N.Y.S.2d 118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coutsoukis-v-samora-nyappdiv-1999.