Holtslander v. C. W. Whalen & Sons

New York Court of Appeals

Holtslander v. C. W. Whalen & Sons

520 N.E.2d 512, 70 N.Y.2d 962, 525 N.Y.S.2d 793, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 538

New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 4, 1988·Published·Cited by 16 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order modified, with costs to plaintiffs against defendant Church, by granting a new trial as against the defendant Church and, as so modified, affirmed, with costs to defendant C. W. Whalen and Sons against plaintiffs, for reasons stated in the concurring in part and dissenting in part memorandum by Justice Howard A. Levine at the Appellate Division (126 AD2d 917, 919-920).

Concur: Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander and Hancock, Jr. Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Titone and Bellacosa dissent in part and vote to affirm for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (126 AD2d 917).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order modified, with costs to plaintiffs against defendant Church, by granting a new trial as against the defendant Church and, as so modified, affirmed, with costs to defendant C. W. Whalen and Sons against plaintiffs, for reasons stated in the concurring in part and dissenting in part memorandum by Justice Howard A. Levine at the Appellate Division (126 AD2d 917, 919-920).

Concur: Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander and Hancock, Jr. Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Titone and Bellacosa dissent in part and vote to affirm for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (126 AD2d 917).

Holtslander v. C. W. Whalen & Sons, 520 N.E.2d 512, 70 N.Y.2d 962, 525 N.Y.S.2d 793, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 538 (N.Y. 1988).

Pincite

520 N.E.2d 512 (Holtslander v. C. W. Whalen & Sons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related