Holtslander v. C. W. Whalen & Sons
This text of 520 N.E.2d 512 (Holtslander v. C. W. Whalen & Sons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order modified, with costs to plaintiffs against defendant Church, by granting a new trial as against the defendant Church and, as so modified, affirmed, with costs to defendant C. W. Whalen and Sons against plaintiffs, for reasons stated in the concurring in part and dissenting in part memorandum by Justice Howard A. Levine at the Appellate Division (126 AD2d 917, 919-920).
Concur: Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander and Hancock, Jr. Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Titone and Bellacosa dissent in part and vote to affirm for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (126 AD2d 917).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
520 N.E.2d 512, 70 N.Y.2d 962, 525 N.Y.S.2d 793, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holtslander-v-c-w-whalen-sons-ny-1988.