Holsey v. Porter
31 S.E. 784, 105 Ga. 837, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 740
Opinion
1. Where a case has been tried hy a jury and a verdict rendered therein, and the losing party desires to have the correctness! of the verdict reviewed hy this court, a motion for a new trial is in-j dispensable.
'2. There being no error of law complained of, and a review of the verdict being sought hy direct bill of exceptions without a motion for a new trial, the writ of error is dismissed. Sanders v. State, 84 Ga. 217, and cases cited; Ford v. Wilson, 85 Ga. 109; Gibson v. Maxwell, Id. 235; Hyfield v. Sims, 87 Ga. 280.
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Holsey v. Porter, 31 S.E. 784, 105 Ga. 837, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 740 (Ga. 1898).
31 S.E. 784 (Holsey v. Porter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Moore v. State
51 S.E.2d 467 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1949)
Patellis v. Tanner
34 S.E.2d 84 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1945)
Robinson v. Georgia Savings Bank & Trust Co.
196 S.E. 395 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1938)
General Tire & Rubber Co. v. Brown Tire Co.
168 S.E. 75 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)
Downer v. Dunaway
53 F.2d 586 (Fifth Circuit, 1931)
Head v. North American Life Insurance
158 S.E. 746 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1931)
Mobley v. Ellis
141 S.E. 321 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)
Jones Bros. v. Richards
99 S.E. 11 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)
Holland v. State
88 S.E. 908 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Mackin v. Blalock
66 S.E. 265 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1909)
Bashinski v. State
51 S.E. 499 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)
Bacon & Sons v. Jones
43 S.E. 689 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1903)
Ocean Steamship Co. v. Hamilton
38 S.E. 204 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)
Taylor v. Reese
33 S.E. 917 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1899)