Holmin v. TRW, Inc.
770 A.2d 283, 167 N.J. 205, 2001 N.J. LEXIS 505
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Lesemann’s opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 330 N.J.Super. 30, 748 A.2d 1141 (2000).
[206]*206For affirmance — Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices STEIN, COLEMAN, LONG, VERNIERO, LaVECCHIA and ZAZZALI — 7.
Opposed — none.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Holmin v. TRW, Inc., 770 A.2d 283, 167 N.J. 205, 2001 N.J. LEXIS 505 (N.J. 2001).
770 A.2d 283 (Holmin v. TRW, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Holmin v. TRW, INC.
770 A.2d 283 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2001)