Holmin v. TRW, INC.
This text of 770 A.2d 283 (Holmin v. TRW, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Ralph W. HOLMIN, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
TRW, INC., Defendant-Appellant, and
Carmine COPPOLA, Ruth E. Miller, Arthur B. Branstine and Synnex Information Technologies, Inc., Defendants.
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Scott J. Wenner, a member of the New York bar, argued the cause for appellant (Littler Mendelson, attorneys; Mr. Wenner, New York City, Stefanie W. Kohen and William P. McLane, Morristown, on the briefs).
*284 David J. Gruber, Livingston, argued the cause for respondent (Lehman, Lehman & Gruber, attorneys).
Jon W. Green, Springfield, argued the cause for amicus curiae, National Employment Lawyers Association of New Jersey (Deutsch Resnick Green & Gramigna, attorneys).
PER CURIAM
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Lesemann's opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 330 N.J.Super. 30, 748 A.2d 1141 (2000).
For affirmanceChief Justice PORITZ and Justices STEIN, COLEMAN, LONG, VERNIERO, LaVECCHIA and ZAZZALI7.
Opposednone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
770 A.2d 283, 167 N.J. 205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holmin-v-trw-inc-nj-2001.