Holmes v. . Brewer

23 S.E. 268, 117 N.C. 347
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 5, 1895·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Faircloth, C. J.:

The defendant has exercised bis right of appeal for tbe pleasure of continuing litigation, or with tbe hope that something might “turn up” which he could not then foresee, on the theory that accidents will sometimes happen. No error was called to our attention and on careful examination of the record we are unable to see any. The errors assigned are all overruled.

Judgment Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holmes v. . Brewer, 23 S.E. 268, 117 N.C. 347 (N.C. 1895).

23 S.E. 268 (Holmes v. . Brewer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Claywell v. . Sudderth
77 N.C. 287 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1877)