Holmes v. . Brewer

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Holmes v. . Brewer

23 S.E. 268, 117 N.C. 347

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedSeptember 5, 1895

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 23 S.E. 268 (Holmes v. . Brewer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Holmes v. . Brewer, 23 S.E. 268, 117 N.C. 347 (N.C. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

Faircloth, C. J.:

The defendant has exercised bis right of appeal for tbe pleasure of continuing litigation, or with tbe hope that something might “turn up” which he could not then foresee, on the theory that accidents will sometimes happen. No error was called to our attention and on careful examination of the record we are unable to see any. The errors assigned are all overruled.

Judgment Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Faircloth, C. J.:

The defendant has exercised bis right of appeal for tbe pleasure of continuing litigation, or with tbe hope that something might “turn up” which he could not then foresee, on the theory that accidents will sometimes happen. No error was called to our attention and on careful examination of the record we are unable to see any. The errors assigned are all overruled.

Judgment Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 S.E. 268, 117 N.C. 347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holmes-v-brewer-nc-1895.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack