Claywell v. Sudderth
77 N.C. 287
Opinion
The pendency of the action between the same parties for the same cause in another County, and in another Court having jurisdiction, is a good defence to this action, as it avoids multiplicity of suits.
There is no error. This will be certified.
Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Claywell v. Sudderth, 77 N.C. 287 (N.C. 1877).
77 N.C. 287 (Claywell v. Sudderth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McDowell v. Blythe Bros. Co.
72 S.E.2d 860 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1952)
Cameron v. Cameron
68 S.E.2d 796 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1952)
McNeill v. . Currie
23 S.E. 216 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1895)
Williams v. . Neville
13 S.E. 240 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1891)