Holman v. State

175 S.W.3d 182, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1601, 2005 WL 2850380
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Holman v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 133
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 1, 2005·No. ED 85584·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, James Holman (“Movant”), appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Following a jury trial, Movant was convicted of domestic assault in the first degree, section 565.072, RSMo 2000 1 , armed criminal action, section 571.015, and unlawful use of a weapon, section 571.030. Subsequently, Movant was sentenced to a total of twenty years imprisonment. We previously affirmed the convictions. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

1

. All statutory references are to RSMo 2000, unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holman v. State, 175 S.W.3d 182, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1601, 2005 WL 2850380 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

175 S.W.3d 182 (Holman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.