Holly v. State

929 So. 2d 648, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 7420, 2006 WL 1310403
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 15, 2006·No. No. 1D06-0419·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In light of the circuit court’s recent issuance of an order to show cause' and the filing of a response below, we conclude that the granting of mandamus relief is not warranted. We do, however, encourage the circuit court to promptly rule on the merits of the claim before it. Munn v. Florida Parole Comm., 807 So.2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

PETITION DENIED.

DAVIS, POLSTON, and THOMAS, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holly v. State, 929 So. 2d 648, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 7420, 2006 WL 1310403 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

929 So. 2d 648 (Holly v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cuesta v. State
929 So. 2d 648 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)