Holly v. State

929 So. 2d 648, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 7420, 2006 WL 1310403
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 15, 2006
DocketNo. 1D06-0419
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 929 So. 2d 648 (Holly v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holly v. State, 929 So. 2d 648, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 7420, 2006 WL 1310403 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In light of the circuit court’s recent issuance of an order to show cause' and the filing of a response below, we conclude that the granting of mandamus relief is not warranted. We do, however, encourage the circuit court to promptly rule on the merits of the claim before it. Munn v. Florida Parole Comm., 807 So.2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

PETITION DENIED.

DAVIS, POLSTON, and THOMAS, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cuesta v. State
929 So. 2d 648 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
929 So. 2d 648, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 7420, 2006 WL 1310403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holly-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.