Holly Sugar Corp. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Holly Sugar Corp. v. United States

60 Cust. Ct. 989, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2904

United States Customs Court·Decided January 23, 1968·No. No. P68/17; protest 65/20373 (San Francisco)·Published

Opinion

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest, described in schedule “A,” attached to the decision, as “Weibull Blender and Conditioner (industrial machinery for use in the manufacture of sugar, and parts thereof)” is the same in all material respects 'as those the subject of Union Sugar Div. Consolidated Foods Corp. v. United States (55 Cust. Ct. 113, C.D. 2559), affirmed, United States v. Union Sugar Div., Consolidated Foods Corp. (54 CCPA 1, C.A.D. 892), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest, described in schedule “A,” attached to the decision, as “Weibull Blender and Conditioner (industrial machinery for use in the manufacture of sugar, and parts thereof)” is the same in all material respects 'as those the subject of Union Sugar Div. Consolidated Foods Corp. v. United States (55 Cust. Ct. 113, C.D. 2559), affirmed, United States v. Union Sugar Div., Consolidated Foods Corp. (54 CCPA 1, C.A.D. 892), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Holly Sugar Corp. v. United States, 60 Cust. Ct. 989, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2904 (cusc 1968).

Pincite

60 Cust. Ct. 989 (Holly Sugar Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related