Holly Sugar Corp. v. United States
This text of 60 Cust. Ct. 989 (Holly Sugar Corp. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest, described in schedule “A,” attached to the decision, as “Weibull Blender and Conditioner (industrial machinery for use in the manufacture of sugar, and parts thereof)” is the same in all material respects 'as those the subject of Union Sugar Div. Consolidated Foods Corp. v. United States (55 Cust. Ct. 113, C.D. 2559), affirmed, United States v. Union Sugar Div., Consolidated Foods Corp. (54 CCPA 1, C.A.D. 892), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 Cust. Ct. 989, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2904, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holly-sugar-corp-v-united-states-cusc-1968.