Hollrah v. Hollrah

Missouri Court of Appeals

Hollrah v. Hollrah

258 S.W.3d 125, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 989, 2008 WL 2893108

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 29, 2008·No. WD 68714·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*126 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Steven Hollrah appeals from a judgment dissolving his marriage to Melissa Hollrah. Mr. Hollrah claims that the trial court abused its discretion in awarding Ms. Holl-rah $30,000 “as further division of property and for waste of marital assets,” awarding Ms. Hollrah one half the value of Mr. Hollrah’s pension because there was no evidence as to its value, and awarding Ms. Hollrah $6,000 as partial reimbursement for her attorney’s fees. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Rule 84.16(b).

LOWENSTEIN, SPINDEN and HOWARD, JJ., concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*126 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Steven Hollrah appeals from a judgment dissolving his marriage to Melissa Hollrah. Mr. Hollrah claims that the trial court abused its discretion in awarding Ms. Holl-rah $30,000 “as further division of property and for waste of marital assets,” awarding Ms. Hollrah one half the value of Mr. Hollrah’s pension because there was no evidence as to its value, and awarding Ms. Hollrah $6,000 as partial reimbursement for her attorney’s fees. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Rule 84.16(b).

LOWENSTEIN, SPINDEN and HOWARD, JJ., concurring.

Hollrah v. Hollrah, 258 S.W.3d 125, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 989, 2008 WL 2893108 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

258 S.W.3d 125 (Hollrah v. Hollrah) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related