Holloman v. State
511 So. 2d 1096, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2113
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 2, 1987
DocketNo. 4-86-2583
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 511 So. 2d 1096 (Holloman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Holloman v. State, 511 So. 2d 1096, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2113 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).
Opinion
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
We reverse on the authority of Whitehead v. State, 498 So.2d 863 (Fla.1986), and remand for resentencing so that the trial court may depart from the recommended sentencing guidelines range if it finds valid reasons for departure. See Morganti v. State, 510 So.2d 1182 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987).
REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Holloman v. State
525 So. 2d 875 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)
STATE, DEPT. OF HEALTH & REHAB. v. McGregor
511 So. 2d 1096 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
511 So. 2d 1096, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holloman-v-state-fladistctapp-1987.