Holloman v. State
511 So. 2d 1096, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2113
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 2, 1987·No. No. 4-86-2583·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
We reverse on the authority of Whitehead v. State, 498 So.2d 863 (Fla.1986), and remand for resentencing so that the trial court may depart from the recommended sentencing guidelines range if it finds valid reasons for departure. See Morganti v. State, 510 So.2d 1182 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987).
REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Holloman v. State, 511 So. 2d 1096, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2113 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).
511 So. 2d 1096 (Holloman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Holloman v. State
525 So. 2d 875 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)
STATE, DEPT. OF HEALTH & REHAB. v. McGregor
511 So. 2d 1096 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)