Holloman v. State
525 So. 2d 875, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 368, 1988 Fla. LEXIS 669, 1988 WL 55624
Opinion
We have for review Holloman v. State, 511 So.2d 1096 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), which expressly and directly conflicts with Shull v. Dugger, 515 So.2d 748 (Fla.1987), and Morganti v. State, 524 So.2d 641 (Fla.1988), quashing 510 So.2d 1182 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.
We quash the decision below and remand for proceedings consistent with our opinions in Shull and Morganti.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Holloman v. State, 525 So. 2d 875, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 368, 1988 Fla. LEXIS 669, 1988 WL 55624 (Fla. 1988).
525 So. 2d 875 (Holloman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Morganti v. State
524 So. 2d 641 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)
Shull v. Dugger
515 So. 2d 748 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1987)
Morganti v. State
510 So. 2d 1182 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Holloman v. State
511 So. 2d 1096 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)