Holloman v. State
This text of 525 So. 2d 875 (Holloman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We have for review Holloman v. State, 511 So.2d 1096 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), which expressly and directly conflicts with Shull v. Dugger, 515 So.2d 748 (Fla.1987), and Morganti v. State, 524 So.2d 641 (Fla.1988), quashing 510 So.2d 1182 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.
We quash the decision below and remand for proceedings consistent with our opinions in Shull and Morganti.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
525 So. 2d 875, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 368, 1988 Fla. LEXIS 669, 1988 WL 55624, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holloman-v-state-fla-1988.