Hollock v. Erie Insurance Exchange

893 A.2d 66, 586 Pa. 262, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 1355
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJune 28, 2005
StatusPublished

This text of 893 A.2d 66 (Hollock v. Erie Insurance Exchange) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hollock v. Erie Insurance Exchange, 893 A.2d 66, 586 Pa. 262, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 1355 (Pa. 2005).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 28th day of June, 2005, Petitioner’s Application for Leave to Supplement its Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, limited to the following issues:

1) Whether conduct of a party during a bad faith action under 42 Pa.C.S. § 8371 is admissible to support a finding of punitive damages.
2) What scope of review should an appellate court apply when reviewing a punitive damages award?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 8371
Pennsylvania § 8371

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
893 A.2d 66, 586 Pa. 262, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 1355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hollock-v-erie-insurance-exchange-pa-2005.