Hollmer v. Harari

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hollmer v. Harari. Read the opinion of the Court — 681 F.3d 1351
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided October 17, 2011·No. 2011-1276·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Cou11 of AppeaIs for the Federal Circuit SHANE C. HOLLMER AND LEE E. CLEVELAND, Appellants, y V. ELIYAHOU HARARI AND SANJAY MEHROTRA, Appellees. 2011-1276 . (Interference No. 105,606) Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark OH`ice, B0ard of Patent Appea1s and InterferenceS. ON MOTION ORDER Seth M. Ga1anter moves without opposition to with- draw as counsel for Shane C. Ho1]1ner and Lee E. Cleve- land Upon consideration thereof IT ls ORDERE1) THAT:

HOLLMER V. HARARI 2 . The motion is granted FOR THE CoURT 1 7 fs/ Jan Horba1}§ Date J an Horba1y C1erk cc: Deanne E. Maynard, Esq. u_S_c nl-ED Seth M. Galanter, Esq. on Timothy R. Volpert, Esq. 0 T 821 C 1 7 2011 lAN|'lDRBA|.Y CLERK` lo

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hollmer v. Harari, (Fed. Cir. 2011).

Hollmer v. Harari (Hollmer v. Harari) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.