Hollmer v. Harari
Opinion
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
Wnitrb ~tatr~ ~ourt of ~peaI~ for tbe jfeberaI ~irmit
SHANE c. HOLLMER AND LEE E. CLEVELAND, Appellants,
v.
ELIYAHOU HARARI AND SANJAY MEHROTRA, Appellees.
2011-1276
(Interference No. 105,606)
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.
ON MOTION
ORDER
The appellees move for a 28-day extension of time, until August 10, 2011, to file their brief.
Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
HOLLMER v. HARARI 2
The motion is granted.
FOR THE COURT
JJL 192011 lsI Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
cc: Deanne E. Maynard, Esq.
Timothy R. Volpert, Esq.
s21 FILED
•.s. COURT OF A!'PfAtS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
JUL 19 2011
JAN HOR8AI.Y
tlERK
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hollmer v. Harari (Hollmer v. Harari) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.