Hollmer v. Harari

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hollmer v. Harari. Read the opinion of the Court — 681 F.3d 1351
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided July 19, 2011·No. 2011-1276·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Wnitrb ~tatr~ ~ourt of ~peaI~ for tbe jfeberaI ~irmit

SHANE c. HOLLMER AND LEE E. CLEVELAND, Appellants,

v.

ELIYAHOU HARARI AND SANJAY MEHROTRA, Appellees.

2011-1276

(Interference No. 105,606)

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.

ON MOTION

ORDER

The appellees move for a 28-day extension of time, until August 10, 2011, to file their brief.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

HOLLMER v. HARARI 2

The motion is granted.

FOR THE COURT

JJL 192011 lsI Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

cc: Deanne E. Maynard, Esq.

Timothy R. Volpert, Esq.

s21 FILED

•.s. COURT OF A!'PfAtS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

JUL 19 2011

JAN HOR8AI.Y

tlERK

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hollmer v. Harari, (Fed. Cir. 2011).

Hollmer v. Harari (Hollmer v. Harari) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.