Hollis v. Nelson

692 A.2d 1081, 547 Pa. 678, 1997 Pa. LEXIS 806

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 22, 1997·No. Petition No. 495 Eastern District Allocatur Docket 1996·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 22nd day of April, 1997, it is ORDERED that the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED BUT LIMITED to the following:

Whether the Superior Court erred in affirming the trial court’s valuation of Petitioner’s pension as of the date of the separation hearing?

[679]*679It is further Ordered that Respondent’s Cross-Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.

NEWMAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 22nd day of April, 1997, it is ORDERED that the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED BUT LIMITED to the following:

Whether the Superior Court erred in affirming the trial court’s valuation of Petitioner’s pension as of the date of the separation hearing?

[679]*679It is further Ordered that Respondent’s Cross-Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.

NEWMAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Hollis v. Nelson, 692 A.2d 1081, 547 Pa. 678, 1997 Pa. LEXIS 806 (Pa. 1997).

Pincite

692 A.2d 1081 (Hollis v. Nelson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.