Hollis v. Nelson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Hollis v. Nelson

710 A.2d 1140

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 16, 1998·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 16th day of June, 1998, the Order of the Superior Court is reversed as to the proper valuation of appellant’s pension. See Gordon v. Gordon, 545 Pa. 391, 681 A.2d 732 (1996). This matter is remanded to the Delaware County Court of Common Pleas for recalculation of the value of the [1141]*1141pension utilizing appellant’s salary on the date of separation.

NEWMAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 16th day of June, 1998, the Order of the Superior Court is reversed as to the proper valuation of appellant’s pension. See Gordon v. Gordon, 545 Pa. 391, 681 A.2d 732 (1996). This matter is remanded to the Delaware County Court of Common Pleas for recalculation of the value of the [1141]*1141pension utilizing appellant’s salary on the date of separation.

NEWMAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Hollis v. Nelson, 710 A.2d 1140 (Pa. 1998).

Pincite

710 A.2d 1140 (Hollis v. Nelson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related