Hollins v. AXCET HR SOLUTIONS, INC.

236 S.W.3d 120, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1456, 2007 WL 3070888
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 23, 2007
DocketWD 68028
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 236 S.W.3d 120 (Hollins v. AXCET HR SOLUTIONS, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hollins v. AXCET HR SOLUTIONS, INC., 236 S.W.3d 120, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1456, 2007 WL 3070888 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

Edward Hollins appeals the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s denial of his application for unemployment compensation. Hollins argues that there was not substantial evidence to support the Commission’s finding that Hollins had engaged in “misconduct” as defined by the Missouri statute. We hold that there was substantial evidence to support the Commission’s decision and affirm the denial of benefits. Rule 84.16(b).

HOWARD, C.J., and BRECKENRIDGE and ELLIS, JJ. concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Berendzen v. Wieberg
236 S.W.3d 120 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
236 S.W.3d 120, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1456, 2007 WL 3070888, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hollins-v-axcet-hr-solutions-inc-moctapp-2007.