Hollins v. AXCET HR SOLUTIONS, INC.
236 S.W.3d 120, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1456, 2007 WL 3070888
Opinion
Order
Edward Hollins appeals the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s denial of his application for unemployment compensation. Hollins argues that there was not substantial evidence to support the Commission’s finding that Hollins had engaged in “misconduct” as defined by the Missouri statute. We hold that there was substantial evidence to support the Commission’s decision and affirm the denial of benefits. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hollins v. AXCET HR SOLUTIONS, INC., 236 S.W.3d 120, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1456, 2007 WL 3070888 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).
236 S.W.3d 120 (Hollins v. AXCET HR SOLUTIONS, INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Berendzen v. Wieberg
236 S.W.3d 120 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)