Berendzen v. Wieberg
This text of 236 S.W.3d 120 (Berendzen v. Wieberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Karey Wieberg (Mother) appeals from a judgment modifying the amount of parenting time she is allowed to spend with her daughter, Kaylin, under a joint custody arrangement. Mother contends: (1) the trial court failed to make the necessary findings to support the modification; and (2) the modification decision was against the weight of the evidence.
Upon review of the record and the briefs, we find no error and affirm the trial court’s modification judgment. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would have no precedential value.
AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
236 S.W.3d 120, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1461, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/berendzen-v-wieberg-moctapp-2007.