Home/Supreme Court/Hollingsworth v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California

Hollingsworth v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California

178 L. Ed. 2d 1, 131 S. Ct. 372, 562 U.S. 801, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 6478, 79 U.S.L.W. 3194
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 4, 2010
DocketNo. 09-1238
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 178 L. Ed. 2d 1 (Hollingsworth v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hollingsworth v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 178 L. Ed. 2d 1, 131 S. Ct. 372, 562 U.S. 801, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 6478, 79 U.S.L.W. 3194 (U.S. 2010).

Opinion

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit with instructions to dismiss the case as moot. See United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 71 S. Ct. 104, 95 L. Ed. 36 (1950).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Perry v. Schwarzenegger
302 F. Supp. 3d 1047 (N.D. California, 2018)
Kristin Perry v. Edmund Brown, Jr.
Ninth Circuit, 2012
Perry v. Brown
667 F.3d 1078 (Ninth Circuit, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
178 L. Ed. 2d 1, 131 S. Ct. 372, 562 U.S. 801, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 6478, 79 U.S.L.W. 3194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hollingsworth-v-united-states-district-court-for-the-northern-district-of-scotus-2010.