Hollingsworth v. Koelsch

Idaho Supreme Court

Hollingsworth v. Koelsch

280 P.2d 418, 76 Idaho 210, 1955 Ida. LEXIS 257

CourtIdaho Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 17, 1955

DocketNo. 8253

StatusPublished

This text of 280 P.2d 418 (Hollingsworth v. Koelsch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hollingsworth v. Koelsch, 280 P.2d 418, 76 Idaho 210, 1955 Ida. LEXIS 257 (Idaho 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

PORTER, Justice.

Except for the name of the plaintiff,' the facts and procedure in this case are identical with those in Case No. 8252 entitled Hollingsworth v. Koelsch, 76 Idaho 203, 280 P. 2d 415, heretofore decided by this court on this date. The plaintiffs in the two cases are brothers and partners in the practice of medicine and surgery. The cases were briefed and presented together.

Upon the authority of the decision in said Case No. 8252, the motion to quash the alternative writ of mandate is denied; and it is ordered that a peremptory writ of mandate issue requiring defendant to forthwith make and enter an order staying the [211]*211order of the Commissioner of Law Enforcement suspending the license of plaintiff to practice medicine and surgery for a period of fifteen months, dated September 27, 1954, pending the determination of the appeal of plaintiff from such order to the District Court of the Third Judicial District of the State of Idaho in and for Ada County. No costs allowed.

TAYLOR, C. J., KEETON and ANDERSON, JJ., and SUTPHEN, District Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PORTER, Justice.

Except for the name of the plaintiff,' the facts and procedure in this case are identical with those in Case No. 8252 entitled Hollingsworth v. Koelsch, 76 Idaho 203, 280 P. 2d 415, heretofore decided by this court on this date. The plaintiffs in the two cases are brothers and partners in the practice of medicine and surgery. The cases were briefed and presented together.

Upon the authority of the decision in said Case No. 8252, the motion to quash the alternative writ of mandate is denied; and it is ordered that a peremptory writ of mandate issue requiring defendant to forthwith make and enter an order staying the [211]*211order of the Commissioner of Law Enforcement suspending the license of plaintiff to practice medicine and surgery for a period of fifteen months, dated September 27, 1954, pending the determination of the appeal of plaintiff from such order to the District Court of the Third Judicial District of the State of Idaho in and for Ada County. No costs allowed.

TAYLOR, C. J., KEETON and ANDERSON, JJ., and SUTPHEN, District Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

280 P.2d 418, 76 Idaho 210, 1955 Ida. LEXIS 257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hollingsworth-v-koelsch-idaho-1955.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack