Hollingsworth v. Attorney General of State of Mississippi

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI ABERDEEN DIVISION KENDRICK L, HOLLINGSWORTH PETITIONER No. 1:24CV20-GHD-RP ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI RESPONDENT

CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY A final order has been issued in a habeas corpus proceeding in which the detention complained of arises out of process issued by a state court under 28 U.S.C, § 2254, The court has considered the record in the case and the requirements of Fed. R. App. P. 22(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), and finds that a certificate of appealability should not issue, For the reasons stated in the opinion, the court finds that the Petitioner has failed to “demonstrate that the issues are debatable among jurists of reason; that a court could resolve issues in a different manner; or that the questions are adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further.” Barefoot v. Estelle, 463 U.S. 880, 893 n.4, 103 S.Ct, 3383, 3394 n.4, 77 L.Ed.2d 1090 (1993) (superseded by statute) (citations and quotations omitted); 28 U.S.C. § 2253(1) and (2). Specifically, the court finds, for the reasons set forth in its, memorandum opinion and final judgment, that the instant petition for a writ of habeas corpus should be dismissed for failure to exhaust state remedies. a. SO ORDERED, this, noe? day of ee LL SENIORJUDGE ————~CS~—t