Holland v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Holland v. State

484 So. 2d 596, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 206, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 5898

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 15, 1986

DocketNo. 85-2583

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 484 So. 2d 596 (Holland v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Holland v. State, 484 So. 2d 596, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 206, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 5898 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Mr. Holland’s motion for post-conviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 was denied without an evidentia-ry hearing. Holland appeals, contending that he was entitled to a hearing under authority of Morgan v. State, 475 So.2d 681 (Fla.1985). Facially, Holland is correct. However our review leaves us convinced that the error was harmless according to applicable criteria and that no purpose would be served by remanding for a hearing. Palmes v. State, 397 So.2d 648 (Fla.1981) and Recinos v. State, 420 So.2d 95 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). See also Section 924.-33, Florida Statutes (1984).

Affirmed.

LETTS, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Mr. Holland’s motion for post-conviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 was denied without an evidentia-ry hearing. Holland appeals, contending that he was entitled to a hearing under authority of Morgan v. State, 475 So.2d 681 (Fla.1985). Facially, Holland is correct. However our review leaves us convinced that the error was harmless according to applicable criteria and that no purpose would be served by remanding for a hearing. Palmes v. State, 397 So.2d 648 (Fla.1981) and Recinos v. State, 420 So.2d 95 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). See also Section 924.-33, Florida Statutes (1984).

Affirmed.

LETTS, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

484 So. 2d 596, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 206, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 5898, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holland-v-state-fladistctapp-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack