Smith v. State

450 So. 2d 480, 1984 Fla. LEXIS 2929
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMay 10, 1984
DocketNo. 63021
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 450 So. 2d 480 (Smith v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. State, 450 So. 2d 480, 1984 Fla. LEXIS 2929 (Fla. 1984).

Opinion

ADKINS, Justice.

We have for review Smith v. State, 422 So.2d 1065 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), which expressly and directly conflicts with State v. Doherty, 240 So.2d 332 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970). We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution.

We approve and adopt the opinion of the First District Court of Appeal in Smith v. State. We disapprove State v. Doherty to the extent that it holds that the state, demonstrating the veracity of hearsay information relied on for an arrest, must show both the credibility of the informant and the reliability of his information.

It is so ordered.

ALDERMAN, C.J., and BOYD, OVER-TON, McDonald, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of St. Petersburg v. Austrino
898 So. 2d 955 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Grappin v. State
450 So. 2d 480 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
450 So. 2d 480, 1984 Fla. LEXIS 2929, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-state-fla-1984.