Holland v. Singletary

712 So. 2d 840, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8142, 1998 WL 377786
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 9, 1998
DocketNo. 98-1603
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 712 So. 2d 840 (Holland v. Singletary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holland v. Singletary, 712 So. 2d 840, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8142, 1998 WL 377786 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The notice of appeal giving rise to this case was not timely filed, and we therefore dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. However, in light of appellant’s claim that he did not receive the trial court’s order until after the time for instituting an appeal had expired, this disposition is without prejudice to appellant’s right to seek relief in the trial court by motion seeking to set aside the original order and requesting that a new [841]*841appealable order be entered. See Snelson v. Snelson, 440 So.2d 477 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983).

BARFIELD, C. J., and KAHN and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Etienne v. Simco Recycling Corp.
721 So. 2d 399 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
712 So. 2d 840, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8142, 1998 WL 377786, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holland-v-singletary-fladistctapp-1998.