Holland v. Commissioner of the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles

213 A.D.2d 637, 624 N.Y.S.2d 932, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3137
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 27, 1995
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 213 A.D.2d 637 (Holland v. Commissioner of the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holland v. Commissioner of the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles, 213 A.D.2d 637, 624 N.Y.S.2d 932, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3137 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Commissioner of the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles, dated September 1, 1992, which affirmed the decision of an Administrative Law Judge, finding that the petitioner had refused to submit to a chemical test for the purpose of determining the alcoholic content of his blood, revoking the petitioner’s driver’s license, and imposing a $200 civil penalty.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

The determination of the Commissioner of the Department of Motor Vehicles to revoke the petitioner’s driver’s license is supported by substantial evidence. Although conflicting evidence was adduced at the hearing, it was for the Administrative Law Judge to weigh the conflicting evidence and assess the credibility of the witnesses. We may not substitute our judgment for that of the Administrative Law Judge when, as here, the testimony of the witnesses is not incredible as a [638]*638matter of law (see, Matter of Gatto v Adduci, 182 AD2d 760; Matter of Lloyd v County of Suffolk Police Dept., 141 AD2d 644; Matter of Leavy v Commissioner of Motor Vehicles of State of N. Y., 141 AD2d 643; Morina v Passidomo, 109 AD2d 783). Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Hart and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Giampia v. New York State Department of Motor Vehicles
256 A.D.2d 578 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Galante v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles
253 A.D.2d 763 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Stegman v. Jackson
233 A.D.2d 597 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Kandekore v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles
225 A.D.2d 774 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
DelCastello v. Adduci
225 A.D.2d 695 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Boyce v. Commissioner of New York State Department of Motor Vehicles
215 A.D.2d 476 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
213 A.D.2d 637, 624 N.Y.S.2d 932, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holland-v-commissioner-of-the-new-york-state-department-of-motor-vehicles-nyappdiv-1995.