DelCastello v. Adduci

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

DelCastello v. Adduci

225 A.D.2d 695, 639 N.Y.2d 935, 639 N.Y.S.2d 935, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2646

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 18, 1996·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The Commissioner’s determination that the petitioner refused to consent to a chemical test to determine his blood alcohol level in violation of Vehicle and Trafile Law § 1194 is supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Gray v Adduci, 73 NY2d 741; Matter of Boyce v Commissioner of N. Y. [696] State Dept. of Motor Vehicles, 215 AD2d 476; Matter of Holland v Commissioner of N. Y. State Dept. of Motor Vehicles, 213 AD2d 637).

We have considered the petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Miller, J. P., Joy, Hart and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Commissioner’s determination that the petitioner refused to consent to a chemical test to determine his blood alcohol level in violation of Vehicle and Trafile Law § 1194 is supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Gray v Adduci, 73 NY2d 741; Matter of Boyce v Commissioner of N. Y. [696] State Dept. of Motor Vehicles, 215 AD2d 476; Matter of Holland v Commissioner of N. Y. State Dept. of Motor Vehicles, 213 AD2d 637).

We have considered the petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Miller, J. P., Joy, Hart and Krausman, JJ., concur.

DelCastello v. Adduci, 225 A.D.2d 695, 639 N.Y.2d 935, 639 N.Y.S.2d 935, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2646 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

225 A.D.2d 695 (DelCastello v. Adduci) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related